@chester20080
Ακόμη ο Mr. h-index γράφει
Instead, what we appear to have here is an opaque search methodology, little information on how inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied (and no real justification for those criteria)
Ενώ στη δημοσίευση του Ιωαννίδη διαβάζουμε :
o Mr. h-index 4 έχει αμελήσει να συμπεριλάβει στο κείμενο το 2 σελίδες κειμένου από την δημοσίευση του Ιωαννίδη όπου μάλιστα τονίζει :
At the same time, seroprevalence studies may have several caveats in their design, conduct, and analysis that may affect their results and their interpretation. Here, data from the first presented full papers (either peer-reviewed or preprint) as of May 12, 2020 were collected,scrutinized, and used to infer estimates of IFR in different locations where these studies have been conducted
Ο Mr. h-index 4 το αμελεί ηθελημένα ώστε να γράψει παρακάτω ότι Instead, what we appear to have here is an opaque search methodology, little information on how inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied (and no real justification for those criteria) και
For example, seroprevalence studies including healthcare workers were excluded, because the samples are biased, but studies including blood donors were not, even though these are arguably even more biased
That's a strange inconsistency
Studies only described in the media were excluded, but this appears to have included government reports as well
Again, there's no justification for this and it is REALLY WEIRD to exclude government reports (they're doing most of the testing!)
'Επειτα αναφέρει ο Mr. h-index 4 :
For example, seroprevalence studies including healthcare workers were excluded, because the samples are biased, but studies including blood donors were not, even though these are arguably even more biased
That's a strange inconsistency
Πώς καταλήγει στο συμπερασμα περί αντίφασης και θεωρεί τα δείγματα προκατειλημμένα ; Ο Ιωαννίδης πήρε ένα δείγμα ανθρώπων.
Και το αποκορύφωμα είναι όταν παρουσιάζει την εργασία του ως σωστή ! Ενώ έχει δεχθεί σφοδρή κριτική !
A colleague and I did a systematic review and meta-analysis of published estimates of IFR and came to an aggregated estimate of 0.74% (0.51-0.97%) so this is a bit of a surprise to me
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Τέλος
@chester20080 πώς καταλήγεις στο συμπέρασμα ότι ο Ιωαννίδης έχει κάνει λάθη ;
Ένα σύστημα μπορεί εύκολα να σε λιώσει.
ΥΓ : Η δημοσίευση του Ιωαννίδη έγινε τον Μαϊο του 2020.
